You are viewing an archived version of the site which is no longer maintained.
Go to the current live site or the Adventure Gamers forums
Adventure Gamers

Home Adventure Forums Gaming AG Underground - Freeware Adventures King's Quest IX project forced to close


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-09-2005, 12:59 AM   #101
The Solomon of Sarcasm
 
NemelChelovek's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 207
Default

Ethics are not defined by legality. They are defined by personal rights. Vivendi allowed Phoenix Online to progress with the project for four years without intervening; by letting them spend this much time of their lives, without any sort of benefit other than personal satisfaction, on a project that they were ultimately going to cancel, they have acted inethically. Vivendi's forsook its ethical right to the property by allowing progress to continue for so long. Imagine constructing a building on someone else's property for four years, and the owner of the property does nothing until the building is a month away from opening to the public. It would be ridiculous. Same thing here.
__________________
Before you ask, "Nemel Chelovek" is from a Russian fairy tale about a dragon, his uncle, a princess, and a heroic pageboy. Nemel is the uncle in question.

Advertisers don't program morals into their audiences. It would be bad for business.
--Sara Ogaz, Queen of the World

Just about every adventure game includes you needing to combine a ham and a wrench to make a "porkscrew".
--Kevin Wilson
NemelChelovek is offline  
Old 10-09-2005, 01:39 AM   #102
Dungeon Master
 
AFGNCAAP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,152
Default

Ridiculous - maybe. Immoral - why? Do people really miss the possibilities that:
  • It was perfectly rational for Vivendi not to waste time and energy on making the project shut down before they were pretty certain it was going to be released?
  • In the span of 4 years the executives could simply change their mind about letting the fangame live (heck, even the management could have changed 437 times)? Not being tied by any official agreement (unlike what folks at AGDI eventually negotiated), or any agreement for that matter, they had every right to defend their IP. We don't know whether they've really been ultimately going to cancel it since the beginning.
  • Likewise, to echo what Josho touched upon earlier (and what was mostly ignored), we are not privy to what was going behind the scenes. If Vivendi had been pretty liberal about fanfiction up till now*, why assume they are inconsistent bastards? Perhaps, Phoenix guys were indeed in course of negotiations with VU legal department, and those negotiations ended negatively, hance C&D letter?
Also, just thought I'd clarify, the first of three parts was to be released this winter, so calling the game almost done is a bit of a stretch. Of course, a lot of hard work must have been put into it during those 4 years, but still.

Finally, to quote KQIX FAQ:
Quote:
If, however, Sierra does request that we stop the project because of Copyright issues, we will continue the project with different but similar character and location names (for example we may use "Princess Rose" instead of Princess Rosella or the "Land of the Emerald Islands" instead of the Land of the Green Isles). However, the underlying plot will remain the same, so that veteran King's Quest players will feel "at home" despite the changes.
So, what's the problem?

PS Could one of the mods merge the two threads about KQIX, please? Almost identical points emerge in them.

*Though, were they really? I'll have to search thouroughly, but I'm pretty sure for every SQ - The Lost Chapter there was something they got canned. Of the top of my head I can only mention recent Young Gabriel Knight Chronicles renamed Gabriel King because of their intervention.
__________________
What's happening? Wh... Where am I?
AFGNCAAP is offline  
Old 10-09-2005, 02:15 AM   #103
Living with my love
 
Tobbe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,453
Send a message via MSN to Tobbe
Default

This is really sad news, I was really looking forward to this game..You could see that the guys behinf this project really had put effort in making this game..
__________________
''My names George. It means... Well, its just a name''
George Stobbart-Broken Sword
Tobbe is offline  
Old 10-09-2005, 02:55 AM   #104
Grumpy & bitter man
 
VoodooFX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 1,171
Send a message via ICQ to VoodooFX Send a message via MSN to VoodooFX
Default

Merged the two threads with the same topic.
__________________
We may have days, we may have hours, but sooner or later we all push up flowers.
VoodooFX is offline  
Old 10-09-2005, 09:36 AM   #105
AGA
AdventureGameAficionado
 
AGA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cardiff, Wales
Posts: 1,968
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AFGNCAAP
Of the top of my head I can only mention recent Young Gabriel Knight Chronicles renamed Gabriel King because of their intervention.
I don't think Steve McCrea was actually contacted by Sierra, I think the name change was because the whole game was more of a pastiche than a direct fan sequel (prequel...). Could be wrong though.
__________________
Berian Williams - [SIZE=1]Visit agagames.com for free adventure games!
AGA is offline  
Old 10-09-2005, 09:59 AM   #106
Diva of Death
 
Jeysie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Western Massachusetts
Posts: 1,402
Send a message via MSN to Jeysie
Default

Quote:
It was perfectly rational for Vivendi not to waste time and energy on making the project shut down before they were pretty certain it was going to be released?

In the span of 4 years the executives could simply change their mind about letting the fangame live (heck, even the management could have changed 437 times)?

Not being tied by any official agreement (unlike what folks at AGDI eventually negotiated), or any agreement for that matter, they had every right to defend their IP. We don't know whether they've really been ultimately going to cancel it since the beginning.
If I postpone doing something because I don't want to put in the effort, or because I can't decide whether I want to do it or not, and I later find myself forced to do it in a way that pisses people off more than if I commited myself earlier, well, tough bananas for me. I knew what I might have to do, I didn't do it at the optimal time, and now I have to suffer the consequences.

I'm not going to feel sorry for Vivendi, especially since they have a lot more resources and options available than the average person does.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AFGNCAAP
Likewise, to echo what Josho touched upon earlier (and what was mostly ignored), we are not privy to what was going behind the scenes. If Vivendi had been pretty liberal about fanfiction up till now*, why assume they are inconsistent bastards? Perhaps, Phoenix guys were indeed in course of negotiations with VU legal department, and those negotiations ended negatively, hance C&D letter?
(shakes head) Everything I've ever heard from them on the matter was that the team was not in negotiations with Vivendi, and all of their previous attempts to contact Vivendi met with silence. They're in negotiations *now*, of course...

Quote:
Also, just thought I'd clarify, the first of three parts was to be released this winter, so calling the game almost done is a bit of a stretch. Of course, a lot of hard work must have been put into it during those 4 years, but still.
The first part now may be the only part that is fully done, however, the last two parts had significant progress. The game certainly *was* "almost done".

Peace & Luv, Liz
__________________
Adventures in Roleplaying (Nov. 19):

"Maybe it's still in the Elemental Plane of Candy."
"Is the Elemental Plane of Candy anything like Willy Wonka's factory?"
"If it is, would that mean Oompa Loompas are Candy Elementals?"
"Actually, I'm thinking more like the Candyland board game. But, I like this idea better."
"I like the idea of Oompa Loompa Elementals."
Jeysie is offline  
Old 10-09-2005, 10:13 AM   #107
Plumber-x company
 
Filmman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 468
Send a message via AIM to Filmman Send a message via Yahoo to Filmman
Default

i think this is just Stupid what Vugames are doing they just shut down KQIX and they are not going to finish the game That is stupid.
Filmman is offline  
Old 10-09-2005, 01:01 PM   #108
Dungeon Master
 
AFGNCAAP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,152
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AGA
I don't think Steve McCrea was actually contacted by Sierra, I think the name change was because the whole game was more of a pastiche than a direct fan sequel (prequel...). Could be wrong though.
This is what I based my facts on. Only now do I see that I had misinterpreted the sentence: "You play a young Gabby King, who changed his name to avoid a cease-and-desist letter from Sierra’s lawyers." Thanks, AGA.

Anyway, I actually gave this topic some more thought and I can't point any other examples of this, so Jeysie may be right here. If so, I stand corrected.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeysie
If I postpone doing something because I don't want to put in the effort, or because I can't decide whether I want to do it or not, and I later find myself forced to do it in a way that pisses people off more than if I commited myself earlier, well, tough bananas for me. I knew what I might have to do, I didn't do it at the optimal time, and now I have to suffer the consequences.

I'm not going to feel sorry for Vivendi, especially since they have a lot more resources and options available than the average person does.
I'm not sure what to say. I don't want to convince you to be sorry for VU, nor do I feel sorry for them. Moreover, I don't see them as being particularly suffering at the moment, so why should anybody feel this way?
Quote:
(shakes head) Everything I've ever heard from them on the matter was that the team was not in negotiations with Vivendi, and all of their previous attempts to contact Vivendi met with silence. They're in negotiations *now*, of course...
Yeah, I've also *heard* that Bad Brain secured the rights to Freelance Police. And, anyway, note that I'm merely offering possible explanations that don't boil down to Vivendi simply being total jerks.
__________________
What's happening? Wh... Where am I?
AFGNCAAP is offline  
Old 10-09-2005, 01:11 PM   #109
Banned User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 298
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RLacey
Nobody has an ethical right to infringe copyright. Sorry, I know that you're disappointed (as we all are), but that doesn't make Vivendi ethically wrong to close the project.
Make sure to point out that ethics and legality are two often quite different and separate (I am being redundant for effect) beasts.

Kirk
Kirk is offline  
Old 10-09-2005, 01:19 PM   #110
Banned User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 298
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rtrooney
The point I was trying to make is that Vivendi had every right to do what it did in order to protect its Brand. Whether anyone likes what they did is immaterial.
I agree. And I may have done the same thing in their shoes. I, however, have gotten to know a few people and understand a few relationships in association with Vivendi and I see their decision as biting.

The decision is clear. The copyright protection laws are also clear. As far as I am concerned, however, I might as well copyright protect my arse and then shut down recent company projects for crafting 3D tushies like mine.

(This is a joke, and only intended to be slightly off-topic and humorous. If you see it as an uneducated stab into the realm of copyright law then you've gone too far. If you see it as the on-line equivalent of giving someone the raspberry and then high-tailing it out of the joint, then you're spot on.)

Kirk
Kirk is offline  
Old 10-09-2005, 02:15 PM   #111
Plumber-x company
 
Filmman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 468
Send a message via AIM to Filmman Send a message via Yahoo to Filmman
Default

Vugames Shut down the King Quest IX and now Space quest 3 Vga Version so what is next for Vugames shut down.
Filmman is offline  
Old 10-09-2005, 11:16 PM   #112
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 48
Default

We actually have reason to believe the SQ3VGA shutdown was a hoax. Likely motive; being able to quit without being looked down upon for not finishing what was started.

Erpy is offline  
Old 10-10-2005, 11:24 AM   #113
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5
Default

Hey guys! Us fans have finally organized! We're getting together a petition. Find the information here:

http://www.kqix.com/forum/index.php?...2641#msg122641
koko is offline  
Old 10-11-2005, 01:07 AM   #114
Junior Member
 
ClémentXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 21
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erpy
We actually have reason to believe the SQ3VGA shutdown was a hoax. Likely motive; being able to quit without being looked down upon for not finishing what was started.


It would not surprise me (all in all sq7.org still lives) if what you say is true, but would want a little more detail, how come you think this is a hoax?

And why would they have put up their artworks for a few days and deleted the whole site afterwards?
ClémentXVII is offline  
Old 10-11-2005, 03:05 AM   #115
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 48
Default

Quote:
It would not surprise me (all in all sq7.org still lives) if what you say is true, but would want a little more detail, how come you think this is a hoax?

And why would they have put up their artworks for a few days and deleted the whole site afterwards?
Well, first of all, SQ3Remake was in no means close to completion. In fact, the founder had less and less time to be even online as of late. Unlike KQ9, the project didn't announce a release date, wasn't on the edge of release and wasn't even in the public spotlight. VU's legal department aren't adventure gamers and would have severe trouble locating that project at this point. Even if they did, they would have come across several bigger fish who'd get priority over that remake. It makes absolutely no sense that VU would contact them at this point and not anybody else, safe KQ9 who got the real deal.

Second of all, the website was changed without any of the other team members even being informed about it. One moment, everything was still going. The other moment, the webmaster claims to have received word from the director that a c&d was in the mail and that the project was gone. The webmaster says he doesn't have the c&d-letter and that only the director had it. No word from the director during the whole situation. It was already known he was making himself scarce online before. (as he stated at SQ.net)

When one of the SQ3VGA-moderators started accusing the webmaster of making this up, the webmaster took the entire site down and told him to bring proof of fraud or move on with his life.

It's overly convenient that this whole thing happens right after the news of KQ9's demise. Rumor has it the c&d was just an excuse to drop the project without being seen as failure. Since everybody's psyched up about KQ9, most people wouldn't question the claim that a shutdown had occurred.

The whole discussion took place on AGDI's forums. (the Off-topic forum, more accurately)

Erpy is offline  
Old 10-11-2005, 10:40 AM   #116
Junior Member
 
ClémentXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 21
Default

Thanks Erpy, it's quite an interesting read

As you said, it's far easier for them to put the blame on VUGames, but rumours spread soo fast on the net
ClémentXVII is offline  
Old 10-11-2005, 02:20 PM   #117
Plumber-x company
 
Filmman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 468
Send a message via AIM to Filmman Send a message via Yahoo to Filmman
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ClémentXVII
Thanks Erpy, it's quite an interesting read

As you said, it's far easier for them to put the blame on VUGames, but rumours spread soo fast on the net

That True Rumours does Spread fast on the Net
Filmman is offline  
Old 10-11-2005, 06:03 PM   #118
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 113
Default

I'll say the following:

Let's get gaming authorities involved in here!

Gee!
splat44 is offline  
Old 10-12-2005, 06:29 AM   #119
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1
Default Sorry.

This is Alias, I thought ti would be better to cry ''VU'' rather than saying we don't have enough energy to finish this project. MY deepest apolozies.
Alias90 is offline  
Old 10-12-2005, 08:28 AM   #120
Senior Member
 
Ninth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 6,409
Default

I was bored this afternoon, and so I browsed around to read about this SQ3, the SQN thing, etc...

My conclusion : Space Quest fans are all mad.

"Seriously", this would make a rich TV series, with plenty of broken vows, betrayed friendships, repentment, etc...
__________________
...It's down there somewhere. Let me have another look.
Ninth is offline  
 




 


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.