View Poll Results: Which is better for a college student? | |||
Mac notebook | 5 | 50.00% | |
Windows PC notebook | 5 | 50.00% | |
Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
02-03-2009, 04:01 PM | #1 |
The Greater
|
Laptop advice
Hey, guys. I need some input. The college I'm going to be attending has a program where a new laptop is provided for every new student. Students can choose between a Windows PC and a Mac.
My question is, which is better for a student's needs? I won't be using the laptop for gaming, just for web browsing, communicating, and typing word documents. (And after reading the agreement you have to sign before you recieve a laptop, I'm not even sure I want to do that much ) So, opinions? Any help here is much appreciated. |
02-03-2009, 04:13 PM | #2 |
Unreliable Narrator
|
I'd definitely go for the Mac, especially if it's just for internet and word processing. Is cost an issue, or are both laptops equivalently priced, or given to you for free?
__________________
Squinky is always right, but only for certain values of "always" and "right". |
02-03-2009, 04:29 PM | #3 |
The Greater
|
I haven't gotten the paperwork yet, but I understand it's given (or loaned, more accurately, until I graduate) to a student for free.
|
02-03-2009, 05:28 PM | #4 |
Creepy Father Figure
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Texas Dammit!
Posts: 5,107
|
You should have put an "other" button
|
02-03-2009, 05:30 PM | #5 |
Unreliable Narrator
|
For what it's worth, I'd prefer a Mac laptop over a Linux one, too.
__________________
Squinky is always right, but only for certain values of "always" and "right". |
02-03-2009, 06:01 PM | #6 |
Playing character
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 7,472
|
Listen to Squinky, Giligan. OSX is so much better than whatever MS comes up with. And the new Apple laptops are very good.
|
02-03-2009, 08:19 PM | #8 |
Unreliable Narrator
|
Since it appears price isn't an issue in this particular situation, I'd still go for the real Mac. There's more support for it. The hardware's most likely a lot better, too.
__________________
Squinky is always right, but only for certain values of "always" and "right". |
02-03-2009, 11:53 PM | #9 |
Playing character
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 7,472
|
Yeah, what she said. And don't forget that you can always choose to run something else than OSX on a Mac. If you want to play a good adventure game on your MacBook you can install Windows using Boot Camp, and have both OSes on the same machine.
|
02-04-2009, 03:38 AM | #10 |
The Thread™ will die.
|
Do you have system specs for the various PCs? I'd be tempted to go with whatever gives you the most bang for your buck (which in this case is free, but the point still stands). So long as it doesn't eat into battery life, of course.
|
02-04-2009, 08:21 AM | #11 |
The Greater
|
Thanks for the input, guys. Personally, I'd just be happy with whatever one is more reliable and less of a headache to fix.
None whatsoever. "Mac laptop" and "PC laptop" are as technical as the college will get. That'll change when I sign up for the program, but not before, unfortunately. |
02-04-2009, 04:57 PM | #12 |
Creepy Father Figure
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Texas Dammit!
Posts: 5,107
|
Well, if that is as much info as you get I would also go for the Mac. That way you are at least sure of the quality of the components in it.
|
02-04-2009, 05:18 PM | #13 |
In an evening of July...
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,215
|
Mac, that's not even a question. Now that they switched to the Intel platform there would be no reason to say "no" to a Mac. I myself have had quite a headache with my Powerbook in the past as I needed some very specific Windows development applications, but as a browsing/typing machine it is unbeatable.
|
02-04-2009, 08:03 PM | #14 |
Playing character
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 7,472
|
Yesterday I tried VirtualBox on my Mac. It is an Open Source virtual machine made by Sun. You can use it to create a virtual Windows machine on your Mac. In some respects it's even better than Parallels which costs US$ 80.- For instance, it ran 64 bit Windows 7 beta with no problems at all, while Parallels 3.6 can't handle 64 bit OS's (I don't know about Parallels 4.0 because I don't want to pay 80 dollars again for Parallels). I guess you will be disappointed if you try to run applications that rely heavily on DirectX, but for most office work it seems perfect.
|
02-11-2009, 10:42 PM | #15 |
Playing character
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 7,472
|
So waht did you choose Giligan?
|
02-12-2009, 08:13 AM | #16 |
The Greater
|
I haven't had to make the choice yet. Although I probably will go for a Mac.
|
02-12-2009, 10:04 AM | #17 |
Unreliable Narrator
|
Considering that most of us who commented said Mac, I wonder who's voting Windows.
__________________
Squinky is always right, but only for certain values of "always" and "right". |
02-12-2009, 01:53 PM | #18 |
Flower bower bird
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 529
|
I'd go for the Mac, too, Gilligan.
__________________
"Earth laughs in flowers." -Ralph Waldo Emerson |
|