Latest User Reviews

Review of A Golden Wake


Rating by Niclas posted on Oct 21, 2014


I really love Wadjet Eyes games, and I like Grundaslavs Ben Jordan games ( especially the last 3 in the series ). However this games left me disappointed. I was really looking forward to this game, but it did not feel as polished as Wadjet eyes later releases. Puzzles very pretty average and too easy, story was not really interesting, characters were pretty flat, pretty flat pixelated graphics, static Character portraits, and voice acting was not as good as we have been expecting from the voice cast at Wadjet Eye. Overall it would have been a pretty OK game if it was a non commercial release, but being a commercial game it is very average.
Time Played: 2-5 hours
Difficulty: Very Easy

Review of Gabriel Knight: Sins of the Fathers - 20th Anniversary Edition


Rating by Niclas posted on Oct 18, 2014


Same good story, characters, music, and puzzles are here in this remake. Backgrounds and character portraits looks great, but same horrible 3D character models and movement from Phoenix online as always. Also some added unnecessary extra puzzles that does not fit in to the GK world. Overall I enjoyed playing the game, but that is not thanks to the updated version made by Phoenix, but thanks to the already great source material. Good: - great voice acting - great character portraits and backgrounds - same great characters, story, puzzle design as the original Bad: - horrible character animations ( not OK, feels like a half done job. ) - unnecessary added puzzles - some story holes that were not in the original Overall great game because of the already great source material, but considering this is a remake of one of the greatest adventure games ever made, I think Phoenix should have put more effort into it.
Time Played: 5-10 hours
Difficulty: Just Right

Review of Gabriel Knight: Sins of the Fathers - 20th Anniversary Edition


Rating by Doom posted on Oct 17, 2014


Who is the target audience?


I'm not sure. If they aimed at modern crowd, they probably missed the mark. Not only the hardest and/or archaic parts were left untouched. Some frustrating logic puzzles were added. They make zero sense, they are no fun. And why would anyone EVER want to solve a "bonus" gem puzzle? The graphics are now HD, but hardly up-to-date. Because of choppy animation some scenes that require good pathfinding or quick reflexes might really get on your nerves now. Not to mention that quite a number of animations are completely gone, making it more of a downgrade. The interface was reworked, and that's certainly good news for those used to simpler point-n-clicks. Although that panel at the bottom reminds me of hidden object games too much. Old-timers will immediately notice the significant change in art style. Many locations feel less atmospheric, lack details, character, New Orleans! Some of them - like the family castle - were completely redrawn. I do appreciate the updated cutscenes though. Now they look wonderful! Slight adjustments were made to the gameplay. Unnecessary linearity was added here and there. Some locations are hidden or closed for stupid reasons unless you really need them. Several episodes were reworked as well. For example, one beautiful puzzle that required a little attention from the player was barbarically removed and substituted with a primitive "take/use" manipulation for no reason. While the game certainly looks more polished compared to Moebius and Cognition, and obviously more effort was put into production, it still feels like a budget re-release, not a remake of one of the greatest adventure games. And it's not just about the lack of money; it's about craftsmanship. I'm not so sure Gabriel Knight 4 would be such a good idea now.
Time Played: 5-10 hours
Difficulty: Just Right

Review of Gabriel Knight: Sins of the Fathers - 20th Anniversary Edition


Rating by zane posted on Oct 16, 2014


broken


My score is largely based on the fact iv had the poor luck of hitting two dead ends which made it impossible to progress. Also this remake has created a variety of story inconsistencies that did not exist in the original. Therefore I consider this to be borderline unplayable. The voiceacting ranges from ok to awful.. with some of the more important characters (grace and gabe) being not good. The original is an amazing game, one that stood little to gain from a complete graphical overhaul. This doesnt do the original any favors.
Time Played: 5-10 hours
Difficulty: Easy

Review of A Golden Wake


Rating by giom posted on Oct 10, 2014


A good game with pacing issues particularly during the second half.


Finished the game (took about 6 hours), it was a good game. It sets the stage well and it captures the roaring 20s well. A lot of work has been done on locations and it really sets the ambiance. The jazzy soundtrack fits very well. Overall puzzles were logical and a bit on the easy side (just the way I like it). So all in all it was a fun game to spend the evening with. There’s only really one thing I disliked a bit, the game jumps quite fast from year to year and it doesn’t linger very long in any time period. The upside is that the story moves fast but the downside is that I feel that character development is lacking a bit between those time periods especially during the later parts of the game. I felt that Alfie made some life-altering decisions a bit too quickly and the part of the context for those decisions were off camera due to the jumping between years. The later part of the game also really flies a bit too fast and I felt that I didn’t really have time to appreciate what was happening. The ending is certainly no cliffhanger but personally I tend to prefer more uplifting conclusions. Overall I’d give it a 3.5/5. I think with Resonance (I hated the plot twist from Resonance, it destroyed the enjoyment of the game for me) , it’s the weakest game published by Wadjet Eyes.
Time Played: 5-10 hours

Review of The Vanishing of Ethan Carter


Rating by Devilfish posted on Oct 9, 2014


Short and bittersweet


I literally cannot say anything about this game without spoiling everything about it. So trust me when I say that while it's flawed, everything that's good about it vastly outweighs it. It's short, but it's exactly as long as it needs to be. The absolutely gorgeous graphics alone may be worth it, and I'm not even someone who cares about graphics. I may have finished this game in four hours instead of five if I didn't keep stopping everywhere to take in the view and hammer the screenshot key. If you like weird fiction, short narrative experiences, if you liked games like Gone Home and The Path, if you want a game that puts atmosphere and narrative first, I promise you will love this.
Time Played: 2-5 hours

Review of Alter Ego


Rating by Dan123 posted on Oct 2, 2014


Nice atmosphere, lots of potential but..


Pretty nice game overall but lots of things that had potential to be developed more. Seems like the guys were in a rush to finish the game and tie all the loose knots. The voice acting is spectacular, characters are well contoured and they develop in a very nice way throughout the game. Sound effects despite being a bit limited add a lot to the atmosphere. And this is again a strong point. Lots of tension flowing in the air, with plenty of theories to answer the mysteries. Ending feels abrupt and leaves you wondering what's going to happen next but it's not that bad. Kinda left me wanting for more. Characters move a bit slow so sometimes you would like to have something to increase the speed. All in all a good game, worth playing.
Time Played: 5-10 hours

Page 1 of 72  1 2 3 >  Last ›