Thanks for type informative replies. I must admit I happen to find both somewhat disturbing, though obviously we don't know the details of the incident.
I know the first amendment guarentees freedom of speech and peaceful assembly, and the law you quoted Kirk doesn't seem to contradict it. So it must come down to exactly what happened there.
I have though, to say I am getting concerned about the way the united states is seemingly going, with the idea that to preserve freedom you have to restrict it (even if thats not whats necessairily going on in this case).
Last edited by DomStLeger; 08-29-2004 at 09:19 AM.
Reason: To make my point clearer
|