Thread: Reader reviews
View Single Post
Old 12-08-2004, 05:37 PM   #13
Jackal
Hopeful skeptic
 
Jackal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 7,743
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EasilyConfused
Maybe that's what you were trying to say, Jackal, and I misunderstood.
There was nothing in the original post to suggest anything but scores, so my answer didn't address the possibility of reader comments, except to say that was an entirely different matter.

Yes, that would partially address the issue of irresponsible voting, but it does indeed create a logistical monster.

I'm not at all completely opposed to giving people the opportunity to express their opinions and even give a score. And maybe we can think of a forum-based possibility for that. I mean, that's what they're for - talking about games (and other things).

But at some point, we draw the line and say our reviewers are chosen and developed to represent the public voice of AG on a particular game. We all have biases, but our reviewers are responsibe to present a balanced, professional view, and that simply deserves a place of its own.
Jackal is offline