View Single Post
Old 04-10-2012, 01:36 AM   #98
Banter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 121
Default

I guess the fact that the Larry franchise has been used recently in "modernizations" also factors in. It gets really bizarre when we talk about series that have been cast aside for over a decade, though(i.e: most other Sierra ips).

If I were an executive I would see value in licensing a sequel instead of letting company property rot and be forgotten. Specially if said licensing involves the original developer and has fan appeal. Usually a franchise falls into the limbo after either flopping commercially or critically. What could possibly be their concerns for licensing a sequel?

Last edited by Banter; 04-10-2012 at 01:47 AM.
Banter is offline