View Single Post
Old 04-03-2012, 02:11 PM   #56
thejobloshow
Senior Member
 
thejobloshow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 303
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimovieMan View Post
Especially since the first Larry game (like Kurufinwe already said) was very time-specific. It was a game that captured the feel of the late '80s. Now it's outdated (and I'm not talking about the text parser or the graphics here). A remake of something that's outdated, is itself outdated from the get-go.
Yeah, that's what Vivendi tried to do when they replaced Laffer with this Larry Lovage abomination.

The team has already stated the game is going to be expanded and updated from the original anyway.

Quote:
Originally Posted by zane View Post
it makes no sense to me why they would license out the rights to remake the first game but refuse a new game. Only one thing makes sense: the publisher wanted more money to license out a new game, and everything about the remake is cheaper. They should just say that and stop this dancing around.
And would you donate if they do come out and say that? Is it even that important? That's what I thought.

Last edited by thejobloshow; 04-03-2012 at 02:18 PM.
thejobloshow is offline