Adventure Forums - View Single Post

LuigiHann · 10-09-2006, 08:31 PM

I guess I'll use spoiler tags too...

Spoiler:
I would guess that Gant killed Neil Marshall so that they could forge that evidence to convict Darke, but then he created the evidence to blame Ema both to force Lana to do his bidding, and to prevent anyone from blaming him if it's found that Darke didn't do it.
I do somewhat agree with you about the award... but there is a fairly big turning point that relies on it, that being that Neil Marshal, not Darke, was the one holding the broken knife that Ema saw.
I agree that both of those instances were somewhat contrived.

I was also really surprised toward the end when I realized that Angel Starr wasn't lying the whole time. She seemed a lot shadier than she ultimately was.

10-09-2006, 08:31 PM	#2
LuigiHann Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 141	I guess I'll use spoiler tags too... Spoiler: I would guess that Gant killed Neil Marshall so that they could forge that evidence to convict Darke, but then he created the evidence to blame Ema both to force Lana to do his bidding, and to prevent anyone from blaming him if it's found that Darke didn't do it. I do somewhat agree with you about the award... but there is a fairly big turning point that relies on it, that being that Neil Marshal, not Darke, was the one holding the broken knife that Ema saw. I agree that both of those instances were somewhat contrived. I was also really surprised toward the end when I realized that Angel Starr wasn't lying the whole time. She seemed a lot shadier than she ultimately was.