Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rtrooney
Why not?
|
It's just a bit... silly, I guess. The purpose of a review is usually to state an opinion and information on a game so the public can have a bit more knowledge on the subject to help them decide whether or not they should purchase the game in question. Games cost money and take anywhere from a couple hours to dozens of hours to complete, so there is good reason to want to avoid buying a bad game. Reviews are free and take little to no time to read. There's no need for them to be reviewed in turn. If one contained misinformation, corrections would certainly be neccessary, but not a review. Plus, the whole thing is laughable. If we write reviews of reviews, then others will write reviews of our reviews which were already about different reviews. That could continue on endlessly. What would be the point?
Or maybe you weren't being serious and I need to grow a sense of humor. If so, ignore the above.
Mordalles - Why the hate for Nash?
