Adventure Forums - View Single Post

Jeysie · 09-17-2006, 06:17 PM

Well, I don't think the MI2 characterization is *bad* at all. I could see Monsieur Guybrush getting there eventually, yes. Just that it felt like it ought to have been MI3 characterization, with a more gradual MI2 in between.

And the beginning and endgame (though not the ending itself) are quite cool and good. I loved the whole LeChuck bits in particular. Just that the aimless middle part got a little too loose for my tastes and started getting sidetracked for me. I started getting kinda bored... "Can I just have the last map bit already so I can get back to some actual plot? Please?" Too Many Sidequests Syndrome.

Peace & Luv, Liz

09-17-2006, 06:17 PM	#32
Jeysie Diva of Death Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Western Massachusetts Posts: 1,402	Well, I don't think the MI2 characterization is bad at all. I could see Monsieur Guybrush getting there eventually, yes. Just that it felt like it ought to have been MI3 characterization, with a more gradual MI2 in between. And the beginning and endgame (though not the ending itself) are quite cool and good. I loved the whole LeChuck bits in particular. Just that the aimless middle part got a little too loose for my tastes and started getting sidetracked for me. I started getting kinda bored... "Can I just have the last map bit already so I can get back to some actual plot? Please?" Too Many Sidequests Syndrome. Peace & Luv, Liz __________________ Adventures in Roleplaying (Nov. 19): "Maybe it's still in the Elemental Plane of Candy." "Is the Elemental Plane of Candy anything like Willy Wonka's factory?" "If it is, would that mean Oompa Loompas are Candy Elementals?" "Actually, I'm thinking more like the Candyland board game. But, I like this idea better." "I like the idea of Oompa Loompa Elementals."