I'm not quite sure I understand the reasoning here. Let's set aside the issue of whether Focus on the Family would benefit from such a purchase at all. Even if it does, does it not make sense to reward the things done well and spurn the things done poorly? Does it not make the better statement to encourage the use of their properties in a positive, productive manner? Do you think they'll look at the results and say, "hey, the moderate, more balanced approach is really effective; let's start ramming our agenda down people's throats more"? I dunno. I'm not seeing the connection.
|
