• Log In | Sign Up

  • News
  • Reviews
  • Games Database
  • Game Discovery
  • Search
  • New Releases
  • Forums
continue reading below

Reader reviews for Papers, Please

Adventure Gamers Reader reviews, read what other adventure gamers think of Papers, Please.

Average Reader Rating for Papers, Please

Average based on 21 ratings

Your Rating:

add review

Papers, Please is available at:

Latest reader reviews

Stars - 40

Rating by Karlok posted on Mar 12, 2016 | edit | delete

Stars - 35

Rating by inessa posted on Jul 4, 2015 | edit | delete

Stars - 40

Rating by certmcgurt posted on Jan 24, 2015 | edit | delete

Stars - 15

Rating by thorn969 posted on Nov 18, 2014 | edit | delete

Not for me.

It’s an interesting idea, but annoyingly timed for the whole game - you have until the clock strikes 6 each day to process as many people as you can and really feels like a chore to play, because you have to find and identify flaws on papers, quickly. And the storyline… I’m not sure how rewarding it is. It would take days of playing to get all 20 endings and seems like it would be really a lot of miserable work.

Read the review »

Time Played: 1-2 hours

Stars - 30

Rating by Antrax posted on Jul 20, 2014 | edit | delete

As advertised

Papers, Please is exactly what the box promises. That means unique and innovative, but also fairly dull and ugly. Arguing with deliberate design choices is rarely fruitful, so I’ll just say I could enjoy it more had other choices been made.

The atmosphere is excellent. Music, presentation and the graphical style do a great job of conveying a “Soviet” atmosphere.
The game play, however, is lacking. In part this is deliberate, since you can later spend money to somewhat improve the cumbersome interface. Still, the decision to limit the player’s interaction to pointing out discrepancies and stamping passports is somewhat odd. You’re supposed to care about your family, but they have neither names, nor faces, nor personalities.
There are several interactions where you wish you could choose the character’s reply, instead of standing there and waiting for the dialogue to be over.
You can’t refuse bribes, sometimes people just drop money and go.
You can’t discard objects, so people can burden you with items there’s no way to get rid of.
All in all, it looks like a deliberate choice to limit interactivity so much, but I personally felt the game would’ve been better served with an occasional player-controlled dialogue, and maybe some sections before/after working days.

Gameplay itself is tiring. This is again deliberate but it wears thin very quickly. The game heaps on requirements, and very soon you need a deft mouse hand to be able to process enough people to make your daily (?) rent payment. There’s an “easy” mode that may mitigate some of that - being a decent arcade player I just weathered, adopting some heuristics to ignore some of the lower ROI checks.

The plot is rather threadbare, which ties back to the lack of interaction. You’re not given any real reason to choose one side or the other, and the game ultimately has three real endings, the other 17 being slight variations on failure. So, while offering some replay value (getting the endings where you side with on faction requires different choices early on), the endings are rather humdrum and I felt justified in picking mine and then watching the rest on YouTube.

All in all it’s an interesting experiment and very atmospheric game, but the game play is lacking and the fact it’s deliberately so doesn’t make it any more fun.

Read the review »

Time Played: 5-10 hours

Stars - 35

Rating by Eva Castro posted on Jul 12, 2014 | edit | delete

Stars - 45

Rating by cygma posted on Mar 25, 2014 | edit | delete

Stars - 40

Rating by troninho posted on Dec 17, 2013 | edit | delete

Stars - 45

Rating by Misanthrope posted on Oct 17, 2013 | edit | delete

Stars - 40

Rating by -ma- posted on Sep 21, 2013 | edit | delete

Page 1 of 3    1 2 3 > 
Back to the top