You are viewing an archived version of the site which is no longer maintained.
Go to the current live site or the Adventure Gamers forums
Adventure Gamers

Home Adventure Forums Misc. Feedback "The Legend of Kyrandia: Fables & Fiends" Review


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-26-2005, 01:46 PM   #21
Senior Member
 
Ninth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 6,409
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flux
That's only good for rather pointless debate over comparisons between stars or percentages.
Pointless debate is fun. Right?
__________________
...It's down there somewhere. Let me have another look.
Ninth is offline  
Old 07-26-2005, 02:15 PM   #22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 229
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ninth
Pointless debate is fun. Right?
Absolutely!

So... who would win in a fight to the death between Malcolm and Gandalf if you keep in mind that magic was weakening in Legend of Kyrandia 1?

Oh, nice review and personally I'd give it 3.5 out of 5.
EvilMulder is offline  
Old 07-27-2005, 04:10 AM   #23
Elegantly copy+pasted
 
After a brisk nap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,773
Default

Kyrandia 1 was commissioned by Virgin to be a KQ clone. Virgin at that time had dreams of being the next Sierra, and they asked Westwood to make them a game to compete with KQ.

I also think 4 stars is extremely generous to the game. It has a number of serious flaws (including a large number of walking deads) that really should disqualify it for the rating. Hand of Fate might deserve 4 stars, but not this game, in my opinion. On the other hand, it doesn't really bother me that the reviewer thinks differently.
__________________
Please excuse me. I've got to see a man about a dog.
After a brisk nap is offline  
Old 07-28-2005, 03:13 AM   #24
LA-S-LE
 
Ariel Type's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Snow Country
Posts: 549
Default

chapter11studios
I didn't enjoy the maze nor Brandon, I agree with you here. As for the plot: it was actually a linear plot, told as one large story. Unlike KQ games, where you were given one main goal and tons of different scenes/characters etc that had nothing to do with the main story. You just walk around and help everyone in their needs, moving with little steps to your goal. Your sub-quests had nothing to do with the main story, which could be actually characterized "some trouble - hole - victory". In Kyrandia the hero was actually solving his own problems for his own needs. He didn't even want to save the whole kingdom from Malcolm - just his grandfather. And the story actually was centered around his personality - this is how the real plot should look like.
Other characters were very interesting and unique (unlike persons in KQ games, which were stolen from different fairy tales), the was a very good ballance between serious fantasy and humorous, and it was actually a separate world, not just an abstract, "dead" universe.
And, by the way, the world of Kyrandia appeared in 1988 as some little known text game, long before the first game. And it was meant to be a separate universe, not a KQ clone.
As for other ascpects, the pick-n-drop system was unique for adventures; the number of special abilities (the magic amulet) was unique; the puzzles weren't standart, not just "pick everything and use on everything", but mostly had a very unusual construction, with a dose of physic puzzles, and that use of "randomness". Their construction is also a unique feature, and a reason why many gamers consider Kyrandian puzzles bad - they are just not ordinary inventory-dialogue puzzles.
And graphics were symply brilliant. I was simply hypnothised by the beauty of the screens at that time, so I just sat and admired the for minutes.
Ariel Type is offline  
 



Thread Tools

 


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.