About Editing Posts
I can't help but noticed that this time, after a few hours, I can't edit my post. Before, we have about 72 hours to edit our posts. I thought it was just me, until SJH mentioned that he couldn't edit his post either (re: the oversized image), and it was barely even 3 days. How come?
|
Mm, yeah. I'd also like a bit more time, please (if we really need a time limit at all). I wanted to go back and add a picture to my Day 1 post of the 5DAS playthrough, but after only a couple of days it wasn't editable.
|
It wasn't even 24 hours and I couldn't edit my post in another thread.
|
It must be a recent problem... I was able to edit the first post of my Beneath a Steel Sky thread once, which gives an edit limit of at least a week.
Peace & Luv, Liz |
Guess we need a mod/admin to answer this one. I'm glad the subject's come up because I was going to ask how long you could edit a post myself.
Yoohoo. Founts of all knowledge to whom we bow in gratitude for all the hard work you put in to make this a great place to be. Please answer our most humble query. OK, that comes across as sarcastic. I really do appreciate the hard work the staff put in here. Honest! |
Only the admins have the answer. I have no edit limit, so wouldn't have noticed.
|
Only Doug has the answer, really. :)
It's possible the length of time changed when the latest bulletin board update was done. I did notice at that time that "edited by..." with a timestamp stopped appearing when you edit a post. |
In the meanwhile there are ways around this. For one, be more conscientious about how final your post is before posting it. If you find that you had to add/fix/subtract something and you can't edit post #17, then link to it from a new post within the same thread and type that you wanted to add/fix/subtract post #17. Another way is to quote yourself and type something like "This is what I actually meant to say".
|
This should be fixed now. There's still a limit, but it's something like 3 days. If anyone has trouble editing a post in a shorter timeframe than that, please let us know.
|
Why is there any limit to begin with? What if I get drunk and post a compromising picture on the What Do You Look Like thread, but don't realize it until a week later? Or suppose I get googled by a potential employer and they deny me a job based me on me calling the people at StarForce a bunch of b*stards (which I wanted to edit out a few days later, as it really was a stupid and immature thing to say, even if they are), will AG.com intercede on my behalf? Am I going to have to take serious responsibility for everything I say in fun, and "say what I mean, and mean what I say?"
Is this just one of those things where the board software has a time limit and it has to be something, so 3 seemed like as good a number as any? What about the community playthroughs? And finally, does this post have enough question marks? ??? |
Quote:
|
:) Exactly, tabs. That's what I meant when I stated this above:
Quote:
|
If you feel strongly that you want to edit a post and are no longer able to do so, you can always ask a moderator to do it for you.
|
Like tabacco said, you don't get to take back things you've said in person, so three days is a luxury.
I think there needs to be a limit to editing. A discussion can become impossible to follow if everyone keeps going back and changing things they said a week ago. There's really only a few good reasons for editing a post (for example, someone just pointed out I posted spoiler material in clear so I've fixed that) If you've posted something you regret, the chances are anyone who was going to be offended will have seen it after 3 days. If you want to retract your statement they are much more likely to see a new post apologising than notice your old post has changed. As for compromising pictures, the chances are someone will already have copied it to an e-mail and forwarded them round the world if you've left them a week. :D EDIT Editing is good for fixing typos too. But that really is something you should fix BEFORE posting. Hoy Trep. Can you change that "wekk" to "week" in your quote? |
Quote:
|
Bah, being responsible is too much trouble. I'll take my chances otherwise. :P
Besides, now that I think of it, after having worked with some very interesting characters in the industry, I'm probably pretty safe anyway. I once knew a guy who came to work in the summers wearing speedo bikini bottoms and no shirt - and we didn't work at SeaWorld. If they can put up with a guy like that, I probably don't have much to worry about. Then again, he was terribly brilliant... okay then, maybe a bloke like me should be more careful about what he says and does. No more posting Purity Test scores for me. :D |
I mainly want to edit my posts in order to fix typos, improve grammar or wording, clarify unclear sentences, or sometimes do things like add a link or a picture. It doesn't matter how old the post is; if I'm browsing and I notice I made a mistake, I want to correct it. It's mildly annoying to not have the option, which I'm used to from other forums.
I don't get the impression that edit-abuse or revisionism is a big problem on these forums, but I suppose there's a theoretical danger of it if there was no time-limit on editing. So it's a trade-off. But could we please get a bit more time? Like a week? |
^ A week sounds good to me. At least let us have more time to edit the first post in a thread, if not the others.
|
Three days is fine. Chances are, everyone's read your post by a week and are not going to look at it again if you edit.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Design & Logo Copyright ©1998 - 2017, Adventure Gamers®.
All posts by users and Adventure Gamers staff members are property of their original author and don't necessarily represent the opinion or editorial stance of Adventure Gamers.