10-27-2005, 08:39 AM | #21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 6,409
|
Quote:
__________________
...It's down there somewhere. Let me have another look. |
|
10-27-2005, 08:46 AM | #22 | |||
Rattenmonster
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 10,404
|
Every member of this community helps make it what it is. I think all Jack's saying is that even when people have the best intentions, bringing up and/or constantly revisiting certain issues doesn't turn out to be helpful. |
|||
10-27-2005, 08:54 AM | #23 | ||||
Feind der Anonymitaet!
|
Quote:
On a more serious note, I agree with Lucien and Snarky. Honestly, I've never seen this "syndrome" described anywhere - sure, there are things some moderators do which I'll disagree with, but I've never had the impression a moderator did what they did just to flex muscles. Like Jackal said - situations are often much more complicated than a simple black and white. Decisions are hard to make - and every moderator is human. To deduct that they're looking for an excuse to moderate... I'm sorry, but I view that as rude, though I realise it's not intentional. So yes, who's hassling whom? I've seen far too many places with the "be respectful to users, regardless what they're doing" policy end up with moderators who're almost scared to lock a thread, because of the responses it'll elict. So, frankly put, I've got good reason to think moderators being respectful changes nothing in regards to how their actions are perceived. People would still complain "Why did you do this?", maybe even more so, because they had the impression they could fling anything they wanted at said moderators and not be punished. So I guess in summary... it's a lot more complicated than at first glance. Trying to simplify it down to 'you guys are looking for excuses to moderate' doesn't work - I don't know if it's maybe the case every once in a while, but I'm pretty certain if so, it's the minority of events. ...gee, I sound a lot more bitchy than I'm trying to be. Clearly, we need more cheese.
__________________
"Me pee stick bigger you pee stick." (credit to, but not attributed to, Jeysie) "Don't be careful, be immortal." Brat™, certified as by Trep Winner of the Second-Best-Dressed and Non-Specific awards in the Unbiased Impostor Awards™, amongst many others. Non-Conformist to Non-Conformism™ Internet Explodifier™ - the best weapon of mass destruction!!!11one Trademark Overuser™ |
||||
10-27-2005, 08:57 AM | #24 |
Hopeful skeptic
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 7,743
|
Unbelievable.
Ninth, I didn't even REMOTELY imply that everything or even MOST of what people offer is a hindrance. I'm saying there's a line where enough becomes too much. There's also a line between constructive and destructive criticism. And some people some times don't respect or even recognize that line. At that point, it starts becoming a hindrance. I think it's pretty obvious when we tell people that line has been crossed. So please stop looking for reason to be offended by my very general explanation. EDIT: (This post needed a smiley to be Emily-approved. This forum is so dictatorial! ) Last edited by Jackal; 10-27-2005 at 09:18 AM. |
10-27-2005, 09:26 AM | #25 |
Rattenmonster
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 10,404
|
Thanks. Now where's my donut?
|
10-27-2005, 09:29 AM | #26 |
Hopeful skeptic
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 7,743
|
Most of it still seems to be on your face. Powdered do(ugh)nuts tell no lies.
|
10-27-2005, 09:36 AM | #27 |
The Thread™ will die.
|
Did you say free coffee? Where do I sign up to become a moderator!
|
10-27-2005, 09:38 AM | #28 | |
Rattenmonster
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 10,404
|
Quote:
|
|
10-27-2005, 09:38 AM | #29 |
Banned User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Paltz...for now...
Posts: 6,177
|
You'll never take me alive coppers! NEVER!!
|
10-27-2005, 09:49 AM | #30 |
Indegan Peningald
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 140
|
Do you really think my post was "destructive criticism," Jackal? I really was thinking this is a discussion that we should have in the open, because of late there have been quite a few cases where it really seemed a wall was being built between the moderators and the regular visitors. There have been many others in the past, but this one is honestly the quote that made me think it'd be helpful to bring this up:
Tobacco when he closed the Fahrenheit=LSL: Magna Cum Laude thread: "SJH: You're not a mod. I'd rather you didn't tell our mods to 'step back and breath.'" It wasn't the Friends and Fables thread that caused me to write all this up, but this simple reply, because I know I've seen vaguer examples in the past, and this kind of attitude can really divide a community. I've seen it happen before. I think squarejawhero made a really good post that had the potential to bring the thread back on track, but instead of being commended, I thought Tobacco was pretty rude to him. He's not allowed to try and help because he doesn't happen to have moderator privileges? I don't know if there is some history between squarejawhero and Tobacco, but this just really didn't seem helpful at all, and I doubt it made squarejawhero too happy. I've been visiting this website since long before the extra "s," and even though my post count is low, I've enjoyed reading the threads greatly, and I really put a lot of effort in my original post to try and be constructive. The truth of the matter is I don't even agree with some of the implied points I made earlier, I just think this is an issue that would benefit all to have it discussed and settled in the open.
__________________
Bill Clinton for God, 2008! |
10-27-2005, 10:05 AM | #31 |
Hopeful skeptic
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 7,743
|
Argh!!
I'm not commenting on ANY specific threads, posts, or criticism. Fum, just as your comments are based on some amalgam of vague incidents over time, so too am I generalizing about various threads and feedback. I'm not dissecting what's good or bad in any given case; just trying to establish some basic principles. I'll say this again: we are totally open to suggestions, we don't think we're perfect, and we are always looking for ways to improve. Most of our "how to improve" discussions happen behind the scenes, but no one should confuse not seeing those with assuming they don't happen at all. I mean, look where this thread is. We've got a forum dedicated to feedback. And another one for site feedback. But saying we're open to feedback is not the same as saying it's not possible to overdo it, or to offer it in a way that ends up being counter-productive. I'm not judging anyone's attempts to do that HERE or in any previous threads. I'm just saying I hope people take that to heart when they DO post. Also: |
10-27-2005, 10:08 AM | #32 |
Magic Wand Waver
|
When a PM is used to inform a mod/admin, the ensuing discussion is private and must be so. If, however, a verbal handslap is given and the member protests in the forum, then perhaps further discussion should be also in the forum. This way, the member can't cry that "they picked on me". Members can see what was said to the offending member and if it should come to a banning, temporary or otherwise, there will be less hue and cry. Keeping it open also favors the mods in that there can be no accusations of favoritism in treatment if it is all open, nor can there be a charge of ganging up on someone. If you have nothing to hide, then open may be the best way to deal with an issue of rabble-rousing, name-calling or other misbehavior. And it may act as a preventative for others who think that they can get away with it.
I agree that this shouldn't be a democracy - we need the "keepers of the rules" to police the members. Someone has to be in charge, and on a busy forum like this, that is no easy feat! Overall I feel that I agree with 98% of the mods' decisions that I've seen here. Censorship is lower here than anyplace else I've been, and the freedom to say your mind is a great attraction of this forum. Discussions like this can make the mods feel defensive about their decisions, and the reasoning behind them. They needn't feel that way - they have been entrusted with keeping peace here, and enforcing the rules. If the rules need updating to accommodate this, then do so, to back up the mods. All of the mods here strive to be fair, and intervene only when necessary. They keep the place in a relatively harmonious state, despite the disparate ages, ethnic groups and (lord knows) opinionated discussions. I tip my hat to all the mods/admins - you don't have an easy job here. Lynsie
__________________
Nothing can bring you peace but yourself. Ralph Waldo Emerson |
10-27-2005, 10:13 AM | #33 | |
Indegan Peningald
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 140
|
Quote:
__________________
Bill Clinton for God, 2008! |
|
10-27-2005, 10:27 AM | #34 |
Friendly Server Admin
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Marin County, CA
Posts: 4,087
|
I do so love these "Tabacco is an asshole" threads. They're what I live for, really
|
10-27-2005, 10:30 AM | #35 | |
The Thread™ will die.
|
Quote:
is an absolutely great guy, and we love him loads... |
|
10-27-2005, 10:30 AM | #36 |
Epinionated.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London
Posts: 5,841
|
Just to note, there's no history between Tabacco and I. Just a love for Spaced and Futurama... except maybe the fact he likes iPods, and therefore is wrong.
__________________
Starter of Thread Must Die. |
10-27-2005, 10:31 AM | #37 |
Indegan Peningald
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 140
|
I just re-read my original post (which I wrote at 3:00AM last night, by the way. I'm surprised it turned out to be even marginally coherent), and the main point I want to clear up is that the problems I cited are pertinent to this forum least of all those I visit. I visit this forum - by far - the most regularly because, honestly, it has the best assortment of members AND moderators. I really like everyone here. The reason I'm not taking an hour to write a similar post in the other, more hectic, forums I visit is because I really don't care about them so much.
__________________
Bill Clinton for God, 2008! |
10-27-2005, 10:37 AM | #38 | |
Indegan Peningald
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 140
|
Quote:
__________________
Bill Clinton for God, 2008! |
|
10-27-2005, 10:39 AM | #39 | |
Rattenmonster
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 10,404
|
Quote:
*giggles* |
|
10-27-2005, 10:58 AM | #40 | |
Psychonaut
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 5,114
|
Quote:
__________________
I'm not insane, my mother had me tested! |
|