12-10-2006, 05:01 PM | #41 | |
delusions of adequacy
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,403
|
Quote:
|
|
12-10-2006, 06:34 PM | #42 |
is not wierd
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,148
|
::shrug:: I don't really see what the big deal is. I'm not having my parents buy "porn" because I don't really consider it "porn" (and I don't think anyone else does, either).
__________________
Spiwak! It's Kawips spelled backwards! |
12-11-2006, 04:17 AM | #44 | ||
Not like them!
|
Quote:
Here's one relevant bit of an interview which makes it very clear, repeatedly, that it is porn they are dealing with: Quote:
|
||
12-11-2006, 07:14 AM | #45 |
is not wierd
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,148
|
It's nothing new that an artist doesn't reveal much insight into his own material. As I was saying earlier I've read some of the book, and yes many of the scenes in it are sexual in nature, but I never found it titillating and I never got the feeling it was meant to be titillating...therefore I don't consider it "porn." But just to make you guys comfortable I'll make sure mom realizes it's the same book we were talking about earlier, and if she doesn't like the idea I'll change it to Absolute Sandman v.1 or something.
__________________
Spiwak! It's Kawips spelled backwards! |
12-11-2006, 10:39 AM | #46 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tee Oh
Posts: 842
|
You're making it sound like we're all trying to persecute you. That's not my intention, I'm just expressing my opinion/reaction, not trying to push you into an awkward situation.
I'm pretty sure that's enough to make it illegal in some places. |
12-11-2006, 12:48 PM | #47 |
delusions of adequacy
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,403
|
The only flashback I saw (I've not read the whole thing) was of Dorothy recalling a good frig. At what age I don't know, late teens? I'm past caring really .. Maybe start a new thread about outrage over a book we've not seen and we can post there.
|