You are viewing an archived version of the site which is no longer maintained.
Go to the current live site or the Adventure Gamers forums
Adventure Gamers



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-14-2006, 03:31 PM   #1
Unreliable Narrator
 
Squinky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Le Canada
Posts: 9,873
Send a message via AIM to Squinky Send a message via MSN to Squinky
Default Puzzleless Games

For the past while, I've been slowly working on designing a game based entirely upon a conversation, and have been thinking a lot about puzzleless adventure games as a result. Certainly, puzzlelessness is a lot more prominent in IF than in graphical adventures (or so I've heard; my experience with IF is admittedly rather limited). Still, with more and more underground graphical adventures getting made, I'd quite like to see more experimentation in this regard.

So my question to you wonderful folks is as follows: what would you say would make a puzzleless adventure game fun to play? The ability for multiple outcomes and for your actions to make a difference in how the story progresses, so it won't just feel like you're clicking through a machinima movie? High interaction density with your surroundings? Just plain good writing, art direction, etc. (which, of course, is important no matter what)? Does it need to be a lengthy epic to be worth playing? And of course, is it still a game if it has no puzzles?
__________________
Squinky is always right, but only for certain values of "always" and "right".
Squinky is offline  
Old 12-14-2006, 05:27 PM   #2
Rabid Tasmanian Devil
 
LeisureSuitedLooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,158
Default

Hmmm...there was that game where you were at a couple's home, and you just talked to them. I guess you could call that puzzle-less, unless you'd consider their relationship the puzzle. I don't know, I consider branching conversations, open environments, even simply just interacting with a game's world all puzzles, in a way. Definitely sounds intriguing, though. Hewck, I'd play it, just for the curiousity factor!
LeisureSuitedLooney is offline  
Old 12-14-2006, 05:55 PM   #3
Unreliable Narrator
 
Squinky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Le Canada
Posts: 9,873
Send a message via AIM to Squinky Send a message via MSN to Squinky
Default

The game you're thinking about is Façade. Very interesting and ambitious, I found, despite still lacking a lot in its execution. Its creators are making a new game called The Party along the same vein but improved, and I look forward to it.

By "puzzle" (and yes, I know we've had a LOT of discussion around these forums on the subject) I'm thinking of obstructions that won't let you progress further into the story unless you solve them. Things that get you stuck and make you reach for the walkthrough, in other words.
__________________
Squinky is always right, but only for certain values of "always" and "right".
Squinky is offline  
Old 12-14-2006, 10:49 PM   #4
Kung Fu Code Poet
 
jacog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Africa
Posts: 701
Default

IF is definitely a good place to find inspiration. There was one in which you mostly just converse with a statue and find out all about who she was and her relationship with the sculptor. The fun in that lies in the way her story unfolds to you based on what you ask.

Our current game is also without puzzles... so I will be watching this thread methinks.
__________________
http://www.screwylightbulb.com/
jacog is offline  
Old 12-15-2006, 04:40 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Cellardoor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 413
Send a message via MSN to Cellardoor
Default

OK, so no puzzles but what about dialogue triggers? Let's say the protagonist stays at a certain family's house, as in Laura Bow 1. There are various issues going on between the family members, which in LB1 you mostly learn about by spying on people having conversations. I can imagine it would make a fun game if you had to uncover all the people's stories simply by asking questions. At first, you know next to nothing about anyone, but general questions will provide clues which in turn trigger new dialogue options, etc.
__________________
...life under Calico Skies...
Cellardoor is offline  
Old 12-15-2006, 05:18 AM   #6
Kung Fu Code Poet
 
jacog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Africa
Posts: 701
Default

in a way it's like new information becomes inventory items... instead of 'use monkey wrench on pipe' you have 'use knowledge about murder on butler' ... makes them puzzles in a way.
__________________
http://www.screwylightbulb.com/
jacog is offline  
Old 12-15-2006, 05:24 AM   #7
Rabid Tasmanian Devil
 
LeisureSuitedLooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,158
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Squinky View Post
I'm thinking of obstructions that won't let you progress further into the story unless you solve them. Things that get you stuck and make you reach for the walkthrough, in other words.

Yeah, total agreement here; sorry, didn't intend to make it sound like an argument. I was just saying that in any new game, sometimes just learning what limitations the gameworld possesses can be the puzzle. I mean, there are traditional puzzles, sure. But every so often, you get a game like the aforementioned Facade, where you literally are a "stranger in a strange land", in which just basic conversation and understanding become the greatest puzzles, as opposed to "slip newspaper under door to get key", lol. I guess that's why I find your idea so fascinating.

Two other games come to mind, as well. Gabriel Knight 1 had the interesting "tape splice" recorder, which made a really innovative puzzle out of dialogue, in many interesting combinations. And oddly enough, LSL: Magna Cum Laude, a mostly-tedious game that nonetheless had a rather interesting take on dialogue. It had icons at the bottom of the screen, and the player had to "swim" toward icons, to make the conversation continue. There were some pretty varied responses a player could get, as it was solely up to them where to swim and what icons to choose. It was a neat design in a game that seemed pretty "blah" in other ways.

Anyway, as a writer myself, I look forward to seeing this in development. Far too few games have compelling dialogue these days, and I sorely miss seeing it in games. Good luck with it!!
LeisureSuitedLooney is offline  
Old 12-15-2006, 06:23 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
JohnGreenArt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 273
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Squinky View Post
I'm thinking of obstructions that won't let you progress further into the story unless you solve them.
So would you be able to complete the story without having a conversation with anyone?
__________________
"Games are fun. Making games is funner!"
JohnGreenArt is offline  
Old 12-15-2006, 07:08 AM   #9
Dungeon Master
 
AFGNCAAP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,152
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jacog View Post
IF is definitely a good place to find inspiration. There was one in which you mostly just converse with a statue and find out all about who she was and her relationship with the sculptor. The fun in that lies in the way her story unfolds to you based on what you ask.
Galatea. This and Photopia (Which is, design-wise, different from Galatea in that is very linear, ie. the same thing happen at set times, but there are many options to try in between. It also has one, great, puzzle.) are absolute must-plays for anyone who is considering trying their hand at a "puzzleless game", methinks.
__________________
What's happening? Wh... Where am I?
AFGNCAAP is offline  
Old 12-15-2006, 08:52 AM   #10
Game Creator Hobbyist
 
Trumgottist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Stockholm (or Gotland)
Posts: 2,609
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Squinky View Post
The ability for multiple outcomes and for your actions to make a difference in how the story progresses, so it won't just feel like you're clicking through a machinima movie?
Multiple endings has never been a big deal to me personally (I know that some people value it a lot). I can see its value in a short game, but in something longer, I'd rather experience the designer's created ending than make my own.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Squinky View Post
High interaction density with your surroundings?
This I think is more important. There should be stuff to do, or you end up with a movie. "Stuff to do" can consist mostly of dialogue choices, so basically all I've said is that it's cool to be active as a player.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Squinky View Post
And of course, is it still a game if it has no puzzles?
I'd say so, but some would probably call it a toy, movie or a long cutscene.
__________________
Play my game: Frasse and the Peas of Kejick. The Special Edition is now available! (Mac OS X or Windows.)
Trumgottist is offline  
Old 12-15-2006, 10:35 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
Nautilus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Posts: 239
Send a message via ICQ to Nautilus
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Squinky View Post
So my question to you wonderful folks is as follows: what would you say would make a puzzleless adventure game fun to play?
You should try Japanese visual novels. Visual novels are classified as a sub-genre of adventure games, referred to as AVGs in Japan. Visual novels are especially prevailent in Japan, where they make up nearly 70% of PC games released.

Visual novels are distinguished from other game types by their extremely minimal gameplay. Typically the majority of player interaction is limited to clicking to keep the text, graphics and sound moving.

Most visual novels have multiple storylines and many endings; the gameplay mechanic in these cases typically consists of intermittent multiple-choice decision points, where the player selects a direction in which to take the game. These can be more closely compared to story-driven interactive fiction.

Visual Novels
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_novel

There are some nice freeware creation tools. I like Nscripter:
http://nscripter.insani.org/

Last edited by Nautilus; 12-15-2006 at 12:07 PM.
Nautilus is offline  
Old 12-15-2006, 10:39 AM   #12
Rabid Tasmanian Devil
 
LeisureSuitedLooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,158
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nautilus View Post
Most visual novels have multiple storylines and many endings; the gameplay mechanic in these cases typically consists of intermittent multiple-choice decision points, where the player selects a direction in which to take the game. These can be more closely compared to story-driven interactive fiction.
that sounds like those "choose your own adventures" books that were popular when I was in my early teens. Neat idea.
LeisureSuitedLooney is offline  
Old 12-15-2006, 03:00 PM   #13
Unreliable Narrator
 
Squinky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Le Canada
Posts: 9,873
Send a message via AIM to Squinky Send a message via MSN to Squinky
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnGreenArt View Post
So would you be able to complete the story without having a conversation with anyone?
Well, the conversation is the story. That being said, it's possible to complete the story by just watching and not doing anything. It'll just have a different outcome, is all. Does that make any sense?
__________________
Squinky is always right, but only for certain values of "always" and "right".
Squinky is offline  
Old 12-15-2006, 07:27 PM   #14
Unreliable Narrator
 
Squinky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Le Canada
Posts: 9,873
Send a message via AIM to Squinky Send a message via MSN to Squinky
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trumgottist View Post
Multiple endings has never been a big deal to me personally (I know that some people value it a lot). I can see its value in a short game, but in something longer, I'd rather experience the designer's created ending than make my own.
I definitely see where you're coming from. Multiple endings, to me, work a lot better when all endings are equally satisfying, i.e. it's not a matter of one good ending and a bunch of mediocre endings. The latter (in my mind, anyway) tends to make one worry about making the right choices, whereas the former gives more room for just playing and experimenting.

Of course, it's harder to write multiple good endings than it is to just write one good ending...
__________________
Squinky is always right, but only for certain values of "always" and "right".
Squinky is offline  
Old 12-16-2006, 02:03 AM   #15
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 15
Default

Puzzles serve a few purposes:

1) They prevent players from completing the game right away. (Aka: Achieving whatever goal the game sets out.)

2) They are interesting in and of themselves.

If you find other features that perform the same basic functionality, then you can avoid puzzles.

For example: CRPGs use hoards of monsters to kill, to prevent players from completing the game right away.

By the way, I have lots of random thoughts about NPCs on http://www.mxac.com.au/drt . I don't remember which articles specifically talk about NPCs, so you'll probably have to sort through a lot of them to find something that'll spur your imagination.
MikeRozak is offline  
Old 12-16-2006, 04:52 AM   #16
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 87
Default

Maybe the Japanese like it, but clicking through a story sounds boring to me. In order for something to qualify as a game, it has to offer a sense of achievement. Multiple endings don't do that. You can't compare them, so you don't know if you picked the better one. It's just, wow, look at me, I'm in control of this. Not only that, you can't write as good of a story no matter how good of a writer you are. You can't foreshadow, you can't use plot twists. You can only write a mediocre story where the player feels a sense of control. There are a lot of people that enjoy that kind of thing, though.
Try playing one of the IF's that do that and see if you enjoy playing it. A lot of inventory puzzles are lame, have too many options, and aren't story related, but that doesn't mean they should be eliminated in my book.
__________________
Fireside:
Faster than a spider when a foot's coming down.
Able to leap tall leaf piles with a single bound.

Last edited by fireside; 12-16-2006 at 05:35 AM.
fireside is offline  
Old 12-16-2006, 05:05 AM   #17
Senior Member
 
Nautilus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Posts: 239
Send a message via ICQ to Nautilus
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fireside View Post
Maybe the Japanese like it, but clicking through a story sounds boring to me.
That depends on the quality of the story. Good AVGs are in fact really good Interactive Fictions.
Nautilus is offline  
Old 12-16-2006, 11:12 AM   #18
Unreliable Narrator
 
Squinky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Le Canada
Posts: 9,873
Send a message via AIM to Squinky Send a message via MSN to Squinky
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fireside View Post
Try playing one of the IF's that do that and see if you enjoy playing it.
I have.
__________________
Squinky is always right, but only for certain values of "always" and "right".
Squinky is offline  
Old 12-16-2006, 12:03 PM   #19
Rabid Tasmanian Devil
 
LeisureSuitedLooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,158
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fireside View Post
In order for something to qualify as a game, it has to offer a sense of achievement. Multiple endings don't do that.
Not always the case. Look at King's Quest 6, for example. There are a few goals in that game that are entirely optional, provide more plot points, and give you a greater sense of achievement if you seek them out...but the story doesn't suffer if you never see them.

In that game, there are a handful of variations of a satisfactory conclusion, and the player doesn't necessarily suffer from the sense of having missed out on something--while, at the same time, replaying the game can lead them to a different course of actions with an ending just as happy. Granted, it's one of the few games where the alternate endings enhance the experience, but they do exist.
LeisureSuitedLooney is offline  
Old 12-16-2006, 01:17 PM   #20
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 87
Default

Quote:
There are a few goals in that game that are entirely optional, provide more plot points, and give you a greater sense of achievement if you seek them out...but the story doesn't suffer if you never see them.
I think that's something a little different that more adventures should explore. Much more interesting than the multiple endings for me.
__________________
Fireside:
Faster than a spider when a foot's coming down.
Able to leap tall leaf piles with a single bound.
fireside is offline  
 



Thread Tools

 


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.