You are viewing an archived version of the site which is no longer maintained.
Go to the current live site or the Adventure Gamers forums
Adventure Gamers

Home Adventure Forums Gaming Adventure Broken Swords - Original or DC?


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-17-2011, 05:48 AM   #1
Life and times of...
 
UPtimist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Up there in the mist
Posts: 6,025
Default Broken Swords - Original or DC?

So, after having just finished Broken Sword: Shadow of the Templars (Director's Cut - man, these titles can be long), I realized that in fact the DC version varies more than just with new graphics and a bit more in the beginning (haven't played the original). Now, many people, I noticed, are saying that the original was in fact better with more hotspots and unedited puzzles and death scenes and stuff.

Now, first of all, I'm just wondering what the general opinion on this is - do most people really think that as a whole the DC actually takes away from the experience?

What about the DC version of the Smoking Mirror? I didn't really find any talk about that. Was it redone in a similar vein, or is it closer to the original experience now (or more generally accepted as "better")?

Many said that they suggest playing BS1 so that you first play the original and only then the DC. Well, I played the DC, do you think there's something in it for me to play the original version now? Personally, I'm quite happy there's not much of a chance for death scenes, but I guess if the story is different somehow (notably), I'd be interested in finding out...

Also, now that I'm moving on to #2, do people still find that the original is worth playing first, and only then the new version to see what's different, or is the DC at least on par?
UPtimist is offline  
Old 11-17-2011, 06:32 AM   #2
The Quiet One
 
DustyShinigami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Staffordshire, UK
Posts: 1,986
Default

I'm one of those people who thinks the originals are far superior to the DCs. But if people grew up and played the originals first, then that's to be expected I guess. Here's my mini review in the 'Last Finished Game' thread:

Clicky

The second DC wasn't too bad in comparison, but there was still the occasional missing dialogue and tweaks that I wasn't keen on.

Again - clicky

The death scenes don't add anything or make the story different, they just add a layer of suspense and urgency; it helps the games become a bit more exciting in my opinion. They (Revolution) only removed them because they were trying to appeal to the casual market.

If you do decide to get the originals to see for yourself, then at least you won't be breaking your account - they're a pittance to get now.

It's a pity you didn't buy them from GOG recently as they have both the DCs bundled with the originals for free!
__________________
Now Playing: Broken Sword: Shadow of the Templars - The Director's Cut (DS and iPhone), DOOM 3: Resurrection of Evil, Hotel Dusk: Room 215, Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney Justice for All, Silent Hill - HD Collection
Recently Completed: Max Payne, Max Payne 2: The Fall of Max Payne
Next: Bayonetta, Devil May Cry - HD Collection, Max Payne 3, Metal Gear Solid - HD Collection, Silent Hill: Downpour
DustyShinigami is offline  
Old 11-17-2011, 06:57 AM   #3
Life and times of...
 
UPtimist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Up there in the mist
Posts: 6,025
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gazzoid View Post
It's a pity you didn't buy them from GOG recently as they have both the DCs bundled with the originals for free!
Well, actually I did I got the first for free and then 2 and 3 in a sale. That's why I'm asking, I'm wondering whether to first play the original BS2 or continue with the remake (or maybe first replay the original version of the first - though I just finished the DC yesterday. And also I'm just generally interested as this is a bit of a strange turn of events - I expected this to be just a graphical update with only added content (so that the only thing one might complain about had been that the graphics don't fit with the original idea etc. which would've been fine by me)). You know, if it really is, as many said, an inferior experience (in total) to the original game.

Then, like you said, whether it really is a matter of if you played it "back in the day" vs. it being a new experience. I suppose it isn't so bad if this is one's first playthrough?
UPtimist is offline  
Old 11-17-2011, 07:44 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Schneckchen ^.^'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 248
Default

Overall I liked the DC better. I thought the scenes where you play as Nico were actually pretty cool, so that added a lot of new content to the first game. The only thing I didn't really like are those faces they put in for the conversations now... I think a lot of em look pretty dumb lol.

But if you played the DC first I don't think there's really any reason to go back and play the original. The only difference you'll notice is some missing content.
Schneckchen ^.^ is offline  
Old 11-17-2011, 07:45 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
kate me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: In the middle of nowhere
Posts: 612
Default

The second BS (the 2011 one) it's not a DC it's just remastered, so it's the same as the '97 one: same lines, scenes, nothing added (except for character portraits and graphics update)

I've played the first DC and the second remastered versions, I liked the Nico part from the beginning of the DC and I eventually got used to the character portraits, witch I didn't liked at first (I thought George looked to much like an obedient kid...) and I didn't like the missing mouth movements when character talk (not on the portraits, but on the character itself, because I'm too used to that, I guess...)

In the DC you have the scenes with Nico, and maybe some close-ups of 2 or 3 items as I recall, a few new puzzles (like the stained glass one) ,and a very few other thing like....I dunno if I recall this right but U can give Nico the toilet chain from Syria as a necklace to Nico ? If I were Nico, I would've use the frying pan from BS3 (U know, the one that Nico used on Petra...) to George!

Anyways, if I'm going to replay BS again (hmmm...if I'm going to....that's not right! I AM GOING TO! that's better! ) , I'll go with the '96 and '97 release, not with the DC or the remastered, because I already have very fond memories of it as it is...

I think that you get very attached to the old games you liked playing in the past, but since you already played the first DC first and brought the second remastered and if U like the character portraits and the graphics...then you can play the remastered too...

Last edited by kate me; 11-17-2011 at 08:09 AM.
kate me is offline  
Old 11-18-2011, 05:57 AM   #6
The Quiet One
 
DustyShinigami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Staffordshire, UK
Posts: 1,986
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UPtimist View Post
Well, actually I did I got the first for free and then 2 and 3 in a sale. That's why I'm asking, I'm wondering whether to first play the original BS2 or continue with the remake (or maybe first replay the original version of the first - though I just finished the DC yesterday. And also I'm just generally interested as this is a bit of a strange turn of events - I expected this to be just a graphical update with only added content (so that the only thing one might complain about had been that the graphics don't fit with the original idea etc. which would've been fine by me)). You know, if it really is, as many said, an inferior experience (in total) to the original game.

Then, like you said, whether it really is a matter of if you played it "back in the day" vs. it being a new experience. I suppose it isn't so bad if this is one's first playthrough?
Oh. Well, in that case, if you have the originals too (and if they were free then even better!), then I say PLAY 'EM!! If you'd have just bought the DC/Remastered, without any prior knowledge/experience of the originals, and you had no incentive to get the originals, then yes, I'd say the DC/Remastered would be just fine. The DC/Remastered would probably appeal to newcomers anyway thanks to the slightly cleaner graphics/artwork, the hint system, and the easier gameplay - no deaths, hardly any red herrings etc.

But if you, as you say, got the originals for free, then what have you got to lose? You might as well see where it all began and 'spot the differences'. However, if you merely liked/enjoyed the game(s), it might be best to just wait until you decide to give the game(s) another playthrough in the future. If you loved them: dive straight back in as soon as possible!

As for BS2: it doesn't matter which version you play first. As kateme correctly pointed out - it's a Remaster not a Director's Cut. There isn't much change to be honest.
__________________
Now Playing: Broken Sword: Shadow of the Templars - The Director's Cut (DS and iPhone), DOOM 3: Resurrection of Evil, Hotel Dusk: Room 215, Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney Justice for All, Silent Hill - HD Collection
Recently Completed: Max Payne, Max Payne 2: The Fall of Max Payne
Next: Bayonetta, Devil May Cry - HD Collection, Max Payne 3, Metal Gear Solid - HD Collection, Silent Hill: Downpour
DustyShinigami is offline  
Old 11-23-2011, 09:02 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Mikekelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 223
Default

I've played the DC version and I liked the Nico part in the beginning quite a bit. It added allot to the game to me. The rest of the game was quite similar to the original - and I was OK with that.

I say play the DC version - to me its a better game. You can always play the original afterwards and compare the 2. I've played the original and much prefer the DC version.
__________________
I love all third person adventure games

Mikekelly is offline  
Old 11-23-2011, 09:35 AM   #8
lost in rubacava
 
aimless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 322
Default

I agree with you, Mikekelly. They tightened up the game, IMO, removing some dialogue with NPCs that wasn't that great anyway (though I did miss one comment by the receptionist in the clinic about Nurse Grendal) and made it unnecessary to trudge up and down those steps to the Club Alamut. I'll admit the goat and chess puzzles were a snap in the DC but I hated them anyway so I'm not complaining. And I really liked the new part focusing on Nico.

I'm not sure what Gazzoid means about death scenes being cut. They cleaned them up a little,
Spoiler:
Marquet wasn't in so many pieces,
for instance, but honestly the graphics in the original didn't leave me gasping at how horrible that was and everyone who was supposed to die died. So...?

My only gripe about the DC is the ending. Three different graphic styles? Nah.

Oh, shoot, you're talking about George, Gazzoid! Sorry about that. Those scenes were amusing but I don't really think making it impossible for him/you to die made much of a difference to enjoyment of the game.

Last edited by aimless; 11-23-2011 at 09:41 AM. Reason: the light dawned
aimless is offline  
Old 11-23-2011, 11:22 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
terhardp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Croatia
Posts: 291
Default

If you've played the DC version, then storywise and puzzlewise you won't find anything more in the original. The DC of "The Smoking Mirror" is virtually untouched; the gameplay is identical to the original version with only cosmetic novelties added: scenery-obstructing mini-portraits during conversations and horrible drag-and-drop menu.

Personally, I would recommend the people who never played "Broken Sword" games to go for the original versions as the DC ones doesn't bring anything more and better.
__________________
Recently finished: Yesterday
Currently playing:
Next in line: Not sure yet..
Looking forward to: Hitman: Absolution, Tomb Raider, Max Payne 3, The Last Crown, Bracken Tor, Sherlock Holmes: The Testament, Secret Files III
terhardp is offline  
 



Thread Tools

 


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.