View Poll Results: Sierra Vs. LucasArts | |||
Sierra | 48 | 25.53% | |
LucasArts | 100 | 53.19% | |
I'm a huge fan of them both. | 38 | 20.21% | |
I don't like either of them. | 2 | 1.06% | |
Voters: 188. You may not vote on this poll |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
04-21-2004, 01:00 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,773
|
Sierra Vs. LucasArts
I know, this is a pretty pointless thread, but before both companies went to hell which was your favourite when they were still making adventure games. Sierra always use to be my favourite adventure company with LucasArts as a pretty close second. Even though the majority of LucasArts adventures were high quality, Sierra had it's fair share of high quality games as well as lots of others. These games that aren't instant classics were pretty good as well. I think Stinger said in his wrap up article in the Top 20 Adventure Games of All-Time that this forum had a LucasArts bias. Is this true? I've voted for Sierra.
I think LucasArts games have proven to be more replayable though. Pretty much the only Sierra games that I replay now are the Gabriel Knight trilogy which is sort of different in comparison to the other Sierra adventures. These games are pretty damn cool. Last edited by SerialFreak; 04-21-2004 at 01:11 PM. |
04-21-2004, 01:09 PM | #2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
LUCASARTS
Yeah I sorta like Lucasarts more. |
04-21-2004, 01:10 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Greece
Posts: 638
|
In my opinion there's no comparison...
I'm unable to enjoy any of sierra's adventures because of all the dying and saving and restoring which can ruin any great adventure IMO. ...and the adventures from lucas arts much higher quality (not always better though) than any other company... |
04-21-2004, 01:21 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 632
|
Didn't we do this of these not long ago?
Anyway, gotta go with LucasArts. Sierra cannot be ignored, though, mostly because its games were the inspiration for many future adventures. |
04-21-2004, 01:23 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,773
|
Crap. Did we? If you can find the other thread and link it here, the moderators have permission to delete this thread.
|
04-21-2004, 01:23 PM | #6 |
AdventureGameAficionado
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cardiff, Wales
Posts: 1,968
|
You can't compare the two. I love both companies, but they did make very different games after all.
__________________
Berian Williams - [SIZE=1]Visit agagames.com for free adventure games! |
04-21-2004, 01:26 PM | #7 |
T.J. Hooker's Lovechild
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lost Wages
Posts: 149
|
It's kind of hard to compare because Sierra released a much higher quantity of adventure games than Lucasarts... I think that if you assess each companies best games it comes out pretty even.
|
04-21-2004, 01:27 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,773
|
It doesn't have to be based in reality though. It could just be some sort of weird preference based on nostalgia or something.
|
04-21-2004, 01:44 PM | #9 |
The Reggienator
|
I like both companies old adventuregames, but as AGA said, the games are very different, they can't be compared
__________________
"The old standby, that never got old in the first place. We come back to them weekly, nightly, for hours at a time--and they always deliver. They are pure, timeless, and often taken for granted." - Nick Breckon - Shacknews My gamesale list *updated 26.8.2007* Hey, dear people please buy my games, I need money to conquer Europe! Or do something similar. |
04-21-2004, 01:48 PM | #10 |
Rattenmonster
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 10,404
|
I'm a Sierra junkie.
Never even heard of LucasArts back in the day. Dunno why. -emily |
04-21-2004, 02:04 PM | #11 |
Helooooo Bessie!
|
it depends what you want out of a game before you decide which one you like more. lucasarts is more likely to make you laugh your ass off, whereas sierra will make you think more, and probably has a better storyline. there is very little in the way of the best out of the 2, but IMO i prefer sierra.
__________________
Guybrush: I'm on a whole new adventure. Pirate: Growing a mustache? Guybrush: No, Bigger than That Pirate: A beard?!? |
04-21-2004, 02:12 PM | #12 |
Antibacterial
|
Except for the occasional Space Quest and King's Quest game I really dislike most Sierra games, so LEC it is.
|
04-21-2004, 02:22 PM | #13 |
rare groove
|
LucasArts, without a doubt. Very few can measure up to the awesomeness of DOTT, GF, FT, MI and IJATFOA (hehe...).
Mind you, I've ony played the occasional Sierra game. But I didn't really like 'em. Though, I'd love to try the Gabriel Knight games.
__________________
strike a match, strike a pose, strike your girlfriend in the nose |
04-21-2004, 02:41 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 310
|
The quality of the old LEC games always seemed higher than Sierra's.
But the eyes.... fight the eyes.
__________________
As a young boy, when you get splashed by a mud puddle on the way to school, you wonder if you should go home and change, but be late for school, or go to school the way you are; dirty and soaking wet. Well, while he tried to decide, I drove by and splashed him again. - Jack Handey |
04-21-2004, 05:26 PM | #15 |
Rabid Tasmanian Devil
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,158
|
While I like games from both, I'm way more of a Sierra addict. But, like i said, I like 'em both.
First LucasArts game played: Afterlife First Sierra game played: King's Quest 1 |
04-21-2004, 06:12 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,117
|
I prefer LucasArts. Sierra is good too, but I've found some of their games to be a bit too frustrating. Actually, I think Gabriel Knight, Police Quest, and a few of the Leisure Suit Larrys are the only Sierra games that I really enjoyed, but for LucasArts it's a perfect record.
|
04-21-2004, 08:12 PM | #17 |
Tactlessly understated
|
Spoiler: Shame on you AGS with your crass impartiality and Sierra bias! Shame on you! |
04-21-2004, 10:59 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,167
|
Besides Police Quest 1-3 and the Leisure Suit Larry series, Sierra didn't really have that much to offer me. I was totally addicted to those games, but in the end I liked LucasArts more because of the "impossible to die" feature in most of their adventuregames.
Gabriel Knight came a lot later too, I didn't have a PC at it's time of arrival. And it was only just now I got to play the game through, all three of them. And the Dynamix games really impressed me, although Willy Beamish was my favourite among them. But not sure if that SHOULD be counted as Sierra, although they are PART of the Sierra family. |
04-22-2004, 01:08 AM | #19 |
8-Bit Spritemaster™
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: South Hero, VT: USA
Posts: 387
|
I liked Lucasarts better, for a number of reasons...
1: Lucasarts had a better understanding of computer mechanics than Sierra ever did. Sierra started out w/ a few text adventures, and then used a program made by IBM to make their early adventure games. They later had better engines built for them, but it was nothing like Lucasarts, which upgraded its Scumm engine w/ each game. 2: Sierra had too much of a cookie cutter aspect. The games, from the earlier engines all looked practically the same, and had the same sense of humor. Later on, Sierra much improved, and did a fine job at making the games seem far more dissimilar from one another. 3: To many Quest games. Frankly, I wish Sierra would've tried to have been a bit more creative with its series titles. Sky Warrior Bob
__________________
Because breakdancing is evil, and so is the Black Mage,
you will click on this link: |
04-22-2004, 01:31 AM | #20 |
Life and times of...
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Up there in the mist
Posts: 6,025
|
Well, I guess Sierra, even though LucasArts is pretty close. Sierra made the GKs and the King's Quests and I prefer a really mysterious and deep story more than the more humoristic and maybe a little less deeper ones that L.A. makes... I'm not saying that I don't like the L.A.'s stories, I love them, but I just prefer a real, real, real enigma...
OK, Leisure Suit Larry might not be such a mysterious one, but that doesn't count... |