View Poll Results: Sierra Vs. LucasArts | |||
Sierra | 48 | 25.53% | |
LucasArts | 100 | 53.19% | |
I'm a huge fan of them both. | 38 | 20.21% | |
I don't like either of them. | 2 | 1.06% | |
Voters: 188. You may not vote on this poll |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
04-27-2004, 02:47 AM | #61 |
Whinging Pom
|
I voted for Sierra for two main reasons.
Firstly sierra made a huge variety of games, lots of different settings, styles and types. From games like Shivers to Phantasmagoria to Leisure Suit Larry to Space Quest to Kings Quest to Gabriel Knight. Just look at that variety, they had comedy adventures, serious adventures, horror adventures, "family" adventures and adult adventures. They had "point and click" and they had puzzle games. They had murder mysteries, spy thrillers etc. Compare that to Luasarts which, as much as I love them, had one main style: comedy point and click games. I'd say only Grim Fandango and The Dig truel had other elements to them that set them apart form the other 12 Lucasarts games. Sure the comedy varied a little; Sam And Max was off the wall bizarre humour while monkey island was more the game equivalent of a good sitcom. But Lucasarts never had it's Gabriel Knight, or it's Phantasmorgoria, or it's Kings Quest 6 or it's Police Quest 2, did it? Secondly in the time sierra was around it produced many more adventures. Sure quantity doesn't matter it's quality. But they kept fans of series happy with installment after installment. And they produced just as many gems as Lucasarts in the end. Clasics like GK 3 and KQ6 rank up there with MI 1 and 2 and Grim Fandango in my book. But as well as producing as many gems, they also managed to produce many mediocre games that kept people happy. And I think thats an achievement of sierras we often overlook; they kept their diverse groups of fans happy for many years; and as one of those fans I appreciate that. But it is sad isn't it. It's 2004, some 20 odd years since the genre was born, and we've lost the two most prolific adventure makers, sierra in 1999 and Lucasarts practically in 2000. I mourn them both equally.
__________________
Dom Currently Playing Tex Murphey - Under a Killing Moon (YAY GOG.com!) Recently Completed Broken Sword Director's Cut Still Get Mozilla Firefox! Forget that Chrome and IE rubbish! |
04-27-2004, 04:37 AM | #62 | |
Game fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 240
|
Quote:
|
|
04-27-2004, 07:12 AM | #63 | |
Whinging Pom
|
Quote:
__________________
Dom Currently Playing Tex Murphey - Under a Killing Moon (YAY GOG.com!) Recently Completed Broken Sword Director's Cut Still Get Mozilla Firefox! Forget that Chrome and IE rubbish! |
|
04-27-2004, 10:04 AM | #64 |
Game fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 240
|
True. But I still don't think of LucasArts as unversatile.
|
04-27-2004, 01:32 PM | #65 | |
Banned User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 447
|
Quote:
|
|
04-27-2004, 01:48 PM | #66 | |
Under pressure.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
Posts: 3,773
|
Quote:
--Erwin
__________________
> Learn more about my forthcoming point & click adventure: Bad Timing! > Or... Visit Adventure Developers: Everything about developing adventure games. |
|
04-27-2004, 02:03 PM | #67 |
Banned User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 447
|
By unadventurous decision-makers, I meant that the people with the power to say yea or nay to a proposed project probably favored comedy adventures. Who knows what innovative concepts were proposed to the decision-makers at LucasArts, only to be rejected because they weren't comedy adventure? With Sierra, as people have pointed out, we have adventure games in every genre and style imaginable. Ken Williams was famously all for letting his creative people go with their own personal visions, with no censorship whatsoever. Surely no one would claim the same of LucasArts?
|
04-27-2004, 02:06 PM | #68 | |
A search for a crazy man!
|
Quote:
__________________
Chris "News Editor" Remo Some sort of Writer or Editor or Something, Idle Thumbs "Some comparisons are a little less obvious. I always think of Grim Fandango as Casablanca on acid." - Will Wright |
|
04-27-2004, 02:11 PM | #69 |
Under pressure.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
Posts: 3,773
|
Well, I can only be very happy about the fact most LucasArts games involve comedy, since I prefer those kind of adventure games. But that's, of course, a matter of taste. Which is something we can't argue about
My favorite Sierra games are the Space Quest and Larry Series. My least favorite Sierra series are the Kings Quest series, so that should say enough. --Erwin
__________________
> Learn more about my forthcoming point & click adventure: Bad Timing! > Or... Visit Adventure Developers: Everything about developing adventure games. |
04-27-2004, 03:08 PM | #70 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,773
|
Sierra's doing pretty well in this poll. LucasArts attempt at serious games have been pretty screwed up though.
|
04-27-2004, 03:22 PM | #71 | |
Banned User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 447
|
Quote:
I think "comedy" is not so bad as a generic adventure game category. Not that it needs to be used, but it does give the prospective buyer a vital clue to what the game will feel like. Noir would be a completely lacking description of Sam & Max, but anthropomorphic cartoon comedy noir would fit the bill. Long-winded, most definitely, but accurate. Perhaps comedy should be seen as a major category with several subcategories, though: pirate comedy, science fiction comedy. These LucasArts have done. I wouldn't know what to call Grim Fandango, though. "LucasArts adventure" actually describes it perfectly adequately. Any semi-experienced adventurer would know the sort of gaming experience to expect (if not the subject matter) - another indication of the homogeneity of their titles. "Sierra adventure" covers a whole lot more genres and subgenres. The presence of humor does not make something a comedy, though. Quest for Glory features an enormous amount of humor, but I would still describe them as fantasy RPG adventures. It's an "about" thing: QfG is "about" fantasy, roleplaying, and adventuring to me; whereas any of the Monkey Islands aren't "about" a historical era, even though that is the setting. They're about humorous adventuring in piratey settings, hence my thinking of them as humorous, not historical adventures. |
|
07-24-2006, 03:27 PM | #72 |
Don't you FYROM me
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Skopje, Macedonia
Posts: 61
|
Star wars (Lucas Arts)... OK
AVP2 (Sierra)... OK THOSE WERE THE DAYS... BUT NONE OF THEM IS BETTER THAN UBI SOFT MAYBE THIS ISSUE IS OLD BUT THE TRUTH MUST BE TOLD |
07-24-2006, 03:44 PM | #73 | |
LA-S-LE
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Snow Country
Posts: 549
|
Simo Sakari Aaltonen
Quote:
|
|
07-25-2006, 09:25 AM | #74 | |
Hitch-Hiker
|
Quote:
__________________
Regards, DaSilva "If you don't get out of the box you've been raised in, you won't understand how much bigger the world is." - Angelina Jolie _ <Susan falls through the floor and gets stuck> <Paco looks at her blankly> "Whats wrong with you?! Lassy would of had a firetruck here by now!" - Susan Mayer, Desperate Housewives |
|
07-25-2006, 12:06 PM | #75 |
Barroom hero
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 525
|
LucasArts all the way (though somebody clicked Sierra in the poll for me ).
No dead end, no death, as everybody said. Seriously, who wants to fall from a cliff or get caught by a witch when walking the country in an adventure game. Especially when you had floppy disks and that reloading was not that fast. And I don't see Sierra pushing technology : the parsers were at the same level than 8-bit CPC text adventures (VERB NOUN), while Infocom, Magnetic Scrolls and Level 9 were producing magnificient parsers and crazy compression techniques... (yet I liked the possibility in SQ3 to output MIDI from the ST in an adventure game, with a good expander it was great!) Oh.. wait.. KQ8 did push the technology There were not enough LucasFilm games. And Sierra games were a great treat between two of these
__________________
Where are they now? |
07-25-2006, 02:10 PM | #76 | |
Third Guy from Andromeda
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 248
|
Quote:
Parsers didn't require better technology. (As an aside, the effort that went into developing those more powerful parsers was a waste of time, given where adventure games went -- but sound cards and graphics cards have continued to become better and more sophisticated largely owing to upward pressure from game buyers. Sierra was the first company to have an identifiable "upward pressure" effect, and it was significant.) --Josh |
|
07-25-2006, 03:26 PM | #77 | ||
Barroom hero
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 525
|
Quote:
Wasn't Doom a technologic advance? Yet it used the same vanilla hardware than Sierra SCI1 games such as Gabriel Knight... Quote:
But in fact they did. Adventure gamers are story and puzzle lovers, ain't they? When Sierra wasn't even starting developing King's Quest 1, this charming treasure hunt, Infocom was releasing Deadline, a game whose plot can compare to Colonel Bequest, going out in 1990. I liked Sierra games, the first AGI games were really innovative. I don't really think Sierra forced many players into transitionning hardware, going from AGI to SCI0 then SCI1. King's Quest 5 for instance was in 1990 and it was released on Amiga too. Interestingly 1990 is the year Wing Commander was released too, which makes me think Origin deserves the title of the guys wo made the hardware market move. I myself left my ST for a PC when I had to to play Monkey Island 2
__________________
Where are they now? |
||
07-25-2006, 03:36 PM | #78 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 324
|
Quote:
But you're right about Wing Commander. Those games made supercomputers cry. |
|
07-25-2006, 08:38 PM | #79 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5
|
LucasArts all the way. When they started putting out their games on CDs with voiceactors, they got pros. Sierra hired friends and co-workers..And it showed. :S Still, the Quest For Glory Series was pretty kick-arse. :3
|
07-25-2006, 08:47 PM | #80 |
Senior Member
|
At the time when i was playing Maniac mansion, monkey island 1 and 2 and the dig i was thinking that "jeeez, these are far superior to that black and white game my friend has on his mac where you run around completing fairy tales.. kings quest? bah!"
but then a little later i got given a copy of space quest IV for my birthday and i loved it and even though it had been out for a while and had lots of loading time it seemed like Sierra were making better quality games. I think my bias was based on knowledge i didnt have. i then played the other space quests games and 1 leisure suit larry game and so now i have a bit more to base my decision on. LucasArts baby all the way. GoT
__________________
Currently Reading: Ransom, David Malour Currently Playing:Tales of MI ep 3. Currently Watching: SG: Universe, Dexter season 4, V 2009, Defying Gravity season 1, Dollhouse season 2...... |
|